RELATIVE AUTONOMY: MEDIA, FILM & POLITICS
  • blog
  • about
  • Writing

Did somebody say 'neoliberalism'?

22/1/2011

 
Picture
I've been a little busy lately and meant to post something earlier about this. On Tuesday evening last week I met some friends at the Defend the Education Maintenance Allowance meeting at the LSE. There were some good talks. I don't remember the names of all of the speakers, but the event was kicked off by none other than Terry Eagleton. Laurie Penny was there, too; she spoke well, as did the activist Ruby Hirsch. At the same time, I couldn't help but be troubled by some aspects of what was said. There was talk of attacking something called 'neoliberalism' and 'bringing down the [Conservative-Lib Dem] government', whereas in the good old days radicals spoke of assailing 'capitalism' and the 'state'. So should our target really be neoliberalism? And what is neoliberalism anyway?

John Dewey once remarked that ‘government is the shadow cast by big business over society’. The state plays a key role in maintaining the domination of the capitalist class. In fact, without a state to regulate and coordinate the system of competition, market competitors would tear one another, and society, to pieces. The nation state thus functions as what Engels, in Anti-Dühring, called the ‘ideal collective body of all capitalists’, regulating the chaos that arises as capitalist interests compete. Liberals, leftists and ‘anti-globalisation’ activists often complain that the role of the nation state is being usurped by transnational powers such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Yet as the International Communist Current reminds us in its 2009 article ‘The Myth of Globalisation’, these organisations ‘were set up by American imperialism and have operated in its interest ever since. The World Trade Organisation has a slightly broader base but is still the tool of a small number of capitalist countries’. Indeed, despite the global nature of the capitalist market, the nation state form remains indispensable for capitalism. In her book Territory, Authority, Rights, Saskia Sassen has convincingly argued that the forces of ‘globalisation’, far from abolishing the nation state, operate within it – just as surely as the nation state exists within the global order. Thus, while elements of the nation state have been ‘denationalized’, the state retains its vital role in capitalist organisation. ‘No other institution’, as Ellen Meiksins Wood writes in Empire of Capital, ‘has even begun to replace the nation state as an administrative and coercive guarantor of social order, property relations, stability of contractual predictability, or any of the other basic conditions required by capital in its everyday life’.

Left-liberals typically translate the critique of capitalism into a concern about neoliberalism, that is, about the transference of certain economic and social responsibilities from the state to the market. Yet while the tag neoliberalism accurately names certain trends towards deregulation and privatisation in particular economic areas since the 1970s, capitalism’s very survival over the last century has been premised upon an increasing fusion of state and market. At the end of the nineteenth century, Kautsty observed in The Class Struggle that the state was being forced to ‘take into its own hands more and more functions’. In 1915, Bukharin noted in ‘Toward a theory of the imperialist state’ that capitalism had entered a statist phase and Trotsky observed in 1919 that the ‘statification of economic life’ made it ‘impossible to return […] to free competition’. This analysis was widely endorsed by communist groups and individual revolutionaries in subsequent decades and is borne out by economic data: both in the UK and US, government spending as a proportion of Gross Domestic Product, while largely static throughout the nineteenth century, began to grow massively the 1920s. It is sometimes assumed that this statist period came to an end in the 1970s and 80s. In our own time, however, large-scale banking bailouts remind us that states intervene constantly in the operations of the markets in order to maintain the conditions for capital accumulation, while massive standing armies are used to conquer new markets – a situation completely unknown in the nineteenth century.

From the latter point of view, the notion that the state has been 'rolled back' in recent years is a problematic one. In fact, from the perspective of the longue durée, the state can be seen to have significantly increased its scope and power since the early twentieth century, when, in the face of the proletarian threat and the difficulties posed by the relative saturation of global markets, the relatively laissez-fairecapitalism of the nineteenth century gave way to the statified planning regimes of Stalinism, fascism and social democracy.

So are we living in a neoliberal moment? Perhaps in some ways - but the evidence is hardly unambiguous. And wherever we come down on this question, we should be clear that the communist task involves the destruction of the capitalist state per se, rather than neoliberalism or some other supposed configuration of it. We shouldn't allow an obsession with neoliberalism to distract us from the real task at hand - ending the entire system of wage slavery.

As Mark Fisher points out in his book Capitalist Realism, capitalism today is widely understood as the only possible system, becoming, in the absence of visible alternatives, strangely invisible. This, of course, suits capitalism very well indeed (as Brecht once put it, 'capitalism is a gentleman who doesn't like to be called by his name'). For this reason, I think we should be wary of the tendency to substitute the term 'neoliberalism' for 'capitalism'. If we wish to identify and overcome the social ills of our time, we should, as Fredric Jameson advises at the end of his famous essay on postmodernism, 'name the system' that causes them. To focus on neoliberalism is to risk leaving the door open to leftist opportunists seeking not an end to capitalism, but merely the election of left-wing politicians claiming to represent a more 'progressive' version of it. Remember 1997, anyone?

Bosnia, baby!

9/1/2011

 
Picture
Never let it be said that you don't get the most up-to-the-minute movie information here at Relative Autonomy. Tonight I watched a 1998 film, Predrag Antonijevic's Savior, with mixed reactions.

Set during the 1992-95 Bosnian war, Savior is at times an unpleasantly brutal film. Following the death of his wife and child in a Muslim terrorist bombing in Paris, Joshua Rose (Dennis Quaid) goes on an Islamophobic rampage, gunning down worshippers in a mosque. Fleeing to the French foreign legion, he eventually ends up in Bosnia fighting for the Serbs, where he further indulges his murderous bigotry with robotic impassivity. These early scenes are short and stereotypical - resembling a mid-film montage sequence rather than a conventional cinematic opening - so that the film's first quarter seems facile and dramatically under-developed. The acting, moreover, is woeful. Rather than the traumatised automaton he is supposed to be, Quaid looks like a man desperately trying to act like a traumatised automaton.

Things become more interesting when Rose, following a Serb-Muslim prisoner exchange, is obliged to take care of a Serb woman, Vera (Nataša Ninković), who has been raped and disowned by her family. When Vera's child is born, Rose takes on new responsibilities and undergoes the near-statutory moral reawakening. Hackneyed as the narrative may be, there are some touching moments. When Rose and Vera are offered refuge for a night by some kindly civilians, we are given an affecting insight into how ordinary people retain their dignity and generosity in the midst of horror.

Also noteworthy is the film's take on the balance of atrocities during the war. While some have accused the film - directed by a Serb - of pro-Serb bias, the film contains and clearly condemns scenes of Serb violence (in one of the film's ghastliest moments, Rose's degenerate comrade Goran cuts off the finger of an elderly Muslim lady in order to take her ring); but it also unflinchingly depicts Croat/Muslim atrocities - even if the latter do rather outnumber the former.

This is refreshing considering how closely Hollywood (and many other) films about the war have conformed to the anti-Serb script of the US and British news media. Michael Winterbottom's Welcome to Sarajevo (1997) and Richard Shepard's The Hunting Party (2007) are shameless pieces of anti-Serb propaganda in which Serbs are cast as screaming psychopaths and Muslim atrocities go unmentioned. Danis Tanovic's No Man's Land (2001), for all its cultural cachet, also propounds a one-sided view of the war, in its presentation of a neurotic and duplicitous Serb and a 'cool' and liberal, Westernized Muslim soldier. Even Peter Kosminsky's 1999 television film Warriors, which has been widely hailed for its realism and anti-war ethos, takes up the 'evil Serb' paradigm and does not depict Muslim atrocities.

Yet none of these films - including Savior - displays much understanding of the matrix of macro-political forces that contributed to the destruction of the former Yugoslavia. While it is difficult to forget the images of inter-ethnic cruelty in films like Savior, we should also remember how the world's great powers - notably the US, Germany, Britain and France - descended on Yugoslavia like wolves in the 1990s, tearing the country apart. That is a story too little told.

    Archives

    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010

    Categories

    All
    5G
    9/11
    Adam Curtis
    Advertising
    Afghanistan
    Alastair Campbell
    Angelina Jolie
    Anti-fascism
    Ashley Madison (hack)
    Aung San Suu Kyi
    Barack Obama
    Bbc
    Black Lives Matter
    Bnp
    Bosnia
    Brexit
    Burma
    Cancel Culture
    Censorship
    Channel 4
    Charlie Hebdo
    China
    Christopher Hitchens
    Christopher Nolan
    Class
    CNN
    Conspiracies
    Cornelius Cardew
    Covid-19
    Czech Republic
    Daily Mail
    Dalai Lama
    David Berman
    Donald Trump
    Economics
    Egypt
    Environment
    European Union
    Extinction Rebellion
    Facebook
    Falklands
    Fascism
    Feminism
    Film
    Free Speech
    Gaza
    Google
    Greece
    Greta Thunberg
    Guy Hibbert
    Hillary Clinton
    Hong Kong
    Immigration
    Internet
    Iran
    Iraq
    Isis
    Israel
    Itn
    Japan
    Jeremy Clarkson
    Jeremy Corbyn
    Jia Zhangke
    Johann Hari
    John Molyneux
    Jordan Peterson
    Katie Hopkins
    Ken Loach
    Kony 2012
    Labour Party
    Lawrence Hayward
    Libya
    Malala Yousafzai
    Marcuse
    Margaret Thatcher
    Marxism
    Mental Illness
    Music
    Myanmar
    Neoliberalism
    News International
    New Statesman
    New Zealand
    Niall Ferguson
    Noam Chomsky
    Norway
    Ofcom
    Osama Bin Laden
    Owen Jones
    Pakistan
    Palestine
    Paul Mattick Jnr
    Peter Bowker
    Peter Kosminsky
    Populism
    Press Tv
    Quentin Tarantino
    Racism
    Reality Tv
    Red Poppy
    Reith Lectures
    Rihanna
    Riots
    Robin Williams
    Russell Brand
    Russell T. Davies
    Scotland
    Silver Jews
    Single Mothers
    Sky Tv
    Slavoj Zizek
    Stephen Fry
    Stephen Poliakoff
    Stereotypes
    Strikes
    Suicide
    Syria
    Television
    Terrorism
    Terry Eagleton
    The Express
    The Guardian
    The Mirror
    The Sun
    Thomas Piketty
    Tony Grounds
    Tunisia
    Vaclav Havel
    War
    Washington Post
    Winston Churchill
    Wire
    Yugoslavia

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.